Assignment First

美国公共关系论文代写:政治经济

上面的表格显示了美洲大陆部分国家的人均国内生产总值。可以看出,巴巴多斯和古巴的人均收入估计为约50-65%的高在美国的比较。从1790开始,海地可能被认为是世界上最富有的国家,但它并没有像美国那样增长,主要是因为美国利用这些较小的国家作为外围国家,并在工业化中建立自己的本地增长点。自1900以来,美国和加拿大都开始了工业化进程,此后美国和加拿大之间的差距一直保持不变。这表明了美国的政治力量,以及它如何利用它来为自己谈判更好的条件,从而获得工业化的最大利益。因此,与美国相比,这些国家积累的权力明显地显示出收入差距和政治权力差异。这是富国如何利用周边国家和穷国实现其个人动机的一个例子,这些外围国家实际上在工业化进程中落后了。这些差异还可以归因于其他几个因素,如资金的优先性和支出分配。如果美国在体育和社会基础设施方面投入更多,而加拿大却没有,则会对贫富差距提供有意义的解释。除此之外,其他因素,如知识产权保护、教育和医疗保健的增长,金融业的结构,盛行的腐败,和总的创业精神,可能会影响到一个国家的走向和结果将是国家与国家之间的明显的可比参数。有倾向于文化差异也似乎主宰收入的差异和政治力量发现的一些学者如Douglas North [ ]谁承认,美国、加拿大和英国的机构更成功,因为他们更局限于成长和发展的文化比西班牙和其他欧洲国家。

美国公共关系论文代写:政治经济

The above table is showing the GDP per capita income of smaller countries part of the American continent. It is seen that Barbados and Cuba had per capita income that were estimated to be about 50-65% higher in comparison to the United States. Haiti was likely considered as the richest country in the world as of 1790 but it did not grew as America did and these were primarily because of the US using these smaller countries as peripheral counties and build its own local growth in industrialization. Both, the US and Canada opened up their industrialization drives since the 1900 and ever since then the gap has been constant between America and Canada. This indicates the political power of America and how it used it to negotiate better terms for itself in a way that it would receive maximum benefits of industrialization. Thus, the income disparity and political power difference is clearly visible by the powers these countries have accumulated compared to the US. This is one example of how rich countries had used peripheral and poor countries in fulfilling their personal motives and those peripheral countries were literally left behind in industrialization growth. These differences can also be attributed to several other factors like priority of their funding and spending allocation. If the US has invested more in physical and social infrastructure and Canada has not, it would provide meaningful explanation about the disparity. Besides this, other factors like protection of intellectual property rights, growth in education and healthcare, financial sector structure, prevalence of corruption, and the overall over entrepreneurial spirit that could affect where a country is headed and the results would be the obvious comparable parameter between countries. There are tend to be cultural differences also that seem to dominate the differences found in income and political powers by some authors like Douglas North[] who acknowledges that the United States, Canada, and the British Institutions are more successful because they are more confined to growth and development culturally than Spain and other European countries.