美国亚特兰大论文代写：研究案例
向他们的客户提供过期的肉是公司不道德的决定。他们强迫工人改变生产日期，并用新鲜的肉腐烂的肉。工人们也被迫加班。这表明，它不是个人的工作，但它是组织的决定。（上海日报，2014）
在芝加哥郊区的OSI集团不得不不断向麦当劳的烂肉的发生，称它是一个孤立的事件。它造成尴尬OSI集团在全球。客户想要解释这一不道德的事件，许多人想退出他们的合同。
组织中的伦理行为依赖于道德领导。这些领导人总是直接的决策和行动的基础上对社会的社会规范和义务。他们关心他们的追随者和他们的行动影响的人。这种领导在上海福喜缺席。
组织文化：
通过这一事件很明显，组织文化不支持这一观点，组织应照顾它的客户。当客户得到良好的服务时，客户会满意并成为任何组织的忠实客户。然而，上海福喜文化强迫工人混合新鲜和过期肉。此外，该公司没有价值的法律，并没有遵循规则。文化是不赞成提供最优质的产品。相反，文化是关于赚钱的，即使在其他人的生活的程度。它不支持的不道德和道德行为的分化。利润是所有的员工所指示的主要优先事项。领导们参与了错误的行动，并没有重视对客户的忠诚。它没有在OSI集团作为世界领先的高质量产品肉对准工作。
美国亚特兰大论文代写：研究案例
It was unethical decision of the company to provide expired meat to their clients. They forced workers to change the production dates and to use rotten meat with fresh meat. Workers were also forced to work overtime. This shows that it was not individual work but it was the organization’s decision. (Shanghai Daily, 2014)
In Chicago suburbs OSI Group had to continuously apologize to McDonalds on the incidence of the rotten meat and called it an isolated event. It caused embarrassment to OSI Group all over the world. Clients wanted explanations for this unethical incident and many wanted to withdraw from their contracts.
Ethical behaviour in organizations is dependent on ethical leadership. These leaders always direct decision making and actions based on social norms and obligations towards society. They are concerned about their followers and the people influenced by their actions. This leadership was absent in Shanghai Husi.
Organizational Culture:
Through this incident it is obvious that the organizational culture did not support the view that organization should look after its customers. Clients will be satisfied and become loyal customers of any organization when they are given good services. However, the culture of Shanghai Husi forced its workers to mix fresh and expired meat. Also, the company did not value laws, and rules were not followed. The culture was not in favour of providing the best quality products. Instead the culture was about making profits even at the extent of other people’s lives. It did not support the differentiation of unethical and ethical behaviour. Profit was the main priority for all the employees as indicated by the leaders. The leaders were involved in wrong actions and did not value loyalty to the customers. It did not work in alignment with OSI Group as world leader in high quality products of meat.
