澳洲梅铎大学论文代写：反对互联网审查
反对互联网审查的最重要的一点是它似乎反对言论自由，它似乎侵犯了人类的权利。互联网是一个重要的交流工具，这似乎提供了一个平台的人来自世界各地的制造言论自由（Livingstone，2011）。它可以被视为一个个人可以表达观点和立场的地方，而不受社会的接受。然而，互联网审查有助于审查、过滤甚至删除某些人的言论自由。这一措施有助于阻碍信息的自由传播。人们对言论自由权，知情权，权利被侵犯（Ó沟通lafsson，2011）。这就破坏了民主精神。众所周知，这一特定措施对网站有损于表达具体观点和思想。众所周知，互联网的建立是一个挑战。
人们可能会担心，政府似乎滥用审查权，似乎在侵犯社会民主。审查权的控制权掌握在政府手中。政府似乎在滥用审查权，因为不包括反对权威的信息和言论。政府可能会操纵审查权以隐藏那些可能被认为不利于政策的信息（查德威克，2009）。政府似乎拥有互联网审查权，可能最终会使任何质疑政府的人都沉默。政党中的政党似乎在操纵审查权，限制政治反对派手中的权力。公众的知情权被剥夺，公众的控制权掌握在政府手中。因此，在没有对公众进行监督的情况下，对该国的民主状况造成了巨大的损害，这将对整个国家造成严重的负面影响。
澳洲梅铎大学论文代写：反对互联网审查
The most significant point against the internet censorship is that it seems to be against the freedom over speech and it seems to be violating the rights of human. The internet is known to be an important tool of communication that seems to be providing a platform of individuals from all across the globe for making free speech (Livingstone, 2011). It can be considered as a place where individuals can provide an expression of views and position irrespective of the acceptance of society. However, the internet censorship helps in censoring, filtering and even deleting the free speech of some people. This measure helps in hindering the free spreading of information. The right toward free speech of people, right of knowledge, and rights to communicate are violated (Ólafsson, 2011). This results in breaching the spirit over democracy. This particular measure is known to be detrimental towards websites that helps in expressing specific view and thoughts. It is known to be a challenge to the establishment of internet.
People may show concern that the government appears to be abusing the right over censorship and seems to be violating the democracy over the society. The control of censorship is in the hands of the government. The government may seem to be abusing the right over censorship for excluding the information and speeches in opposition to the authority. The government may be manipulating the rights over censorship for hiding information that can be considered disadvantageous to the policies (Chadwick, 2009). The government seems to be having the rights over internet censorship may end up silencing anyone who questions the government. The party of politics in party may seem to be manipulating the rights over censorship for limiting the power in the hands of political opponents. The right to know of public is deprived over and the control of public is in the hands of the government. In the consequent manner, in the absence of supervision over the public, there is a huge damage caused to the democratic condition of the country that will result in giving rise to severe negative impact to the entire country.
