Assignment First

assignment代寫:勞動和工資簡史

李嘉圖只是指出,租金和土地所有者的管制是社會經濟問題產生的主要原因。李嘉圖沒有考慮種族主義的概念,但反對社會中不斷上漲的租金成本。

馬克思的意識形態起源於李嘉圖。他指出,必須壓制某些人,特別是無產階級,以保持廉價勞動力的持續來源。根據馬克思(Hunt, 1993)的觀點,勞動和種族之間有很強的關系。這是社會分化的根源。上層階級或資產階級想要維持一個依賴他們的無產階級階級。在這種情況下,更容易制服來自另一個種族的人,壓迫他們為社會中的資本主義貪婪而工作。因此,社會排斥被當作一種工具來維持對某些種族的控制。有必要分析社會壓迫的根源,以理解經濟學的觀點。

經濟理論從歷史時代到當代具有一些基本的相似性。勞動力經濟學的某些方面保持不變。勞動者的工資是由所有者根據社會中存在的資源供求關系、政治意識形態和修辭來支付的。由此可以用不同的理論來解釋員工的工資模式(Kuper, 2013)。

對某些種族的對抗和壓迫導致個別種族缺乏技術知識,在社會中不成比例地分散。這使得他們被一些種族邊緣化,比如歐洲人。這使得他們向社會勞動者支付更少的工資。他們遵循史密斯和李嘉圖關於工資的資本主義觀點。社會排斥和對馬克思主義哲學的種族壓迫也普遍存在。即使在現代也能發現這種痕跡。

工資是影響生產成本的一個重要因素。應該降低生產成本,以取代斯密和李嘉圖提出的資本主義意識形態。工資的增加導致生產的增加。為了降低工資成本,人們選擇壓迫某些種族。它們是奴隸制、社會排斥和對社會中少數群體的壓迫。基本上,歐洲白人控制著其他種族。與馬克思的意識形態相似,人們也因為商業的原因而受到壓迫。即使在當今時代,這種種族主義的痕跡也存在於這個譜系的某些部分。維持這種權力是為了確保個別經濟的持續增長和進步。

由此可以得出結論,斯密、李嘉圖的資本主義觀點被用來理解降低所有者工資的影響。因此,社會為了維持較低的工資水平,選擇了邊緣化、壓迫和奴役。

assignment代寫:勞動和工資簡史

Ricardo only pointed out to the fact that regulation of rent and landowners to be the primary cause of economic issue in the society. Ricardo did not factor in the notions of racism but was against the rising rent cost in the societies.
Marx ideology stems from Ricardo. He states that certain people esp. the proletariat class needs to be subdued in an effort to maintain constant source of cheap labour. There is a strong relationship between labour and race according to Marx (Hunt, 1993). This was the root of social divide in the society. Upper class or the bourgeois class wanted to maintain a proletariat class that was dependent on them for their means. In this situation it was easier to subdue the people from another ethnicity and oppress them to work for the capitalistic greed in the societies. Hence social exclusion is practiced as a tool to maintain control over some ethnicities. There is a need to analyze the roots of oppression in the society to understand the economic standpoint.
Economical theory from historical times to the current times has some fundamental similarities. Certain facets of economics of labour have remained the same. Labourers are paid by the owners based on the supply and demand of resources, political ideologies and rhetoric existing in the societies. From this the pattern of wages for the employees is explained in different theories (Kuper, 2013).
Antagonism and oppression against certain races had caused the individual ethnicities to lack technical knowledge and be disproportionately scattered in the societies. This causes them to be marginalized by the some ethnicities like the Europeans. This causes them to pay lesser wages to the labour in the society. They follow Smith and Ricardo’s capitalistic views regarding the wages. Social exclusion and racial oppression of Marxist philosophies was also prevailing in the societies. This is found to have traces even in the modern times.
Wage is an important factor involved in the cost of production. In lieu of the ideologies of capitalism proposed by Smith and Ricardo, cost of production should be lowered. Increase in wages leads to increase in production. To ensure lower costs of wages, people chose to oppress certain ethnicities. They were slavery, social exclusion and oppression against the minority communities in the societies. Essentially the European White people controlled other ethnicities. Similar to the ideology of Marx, people were oppressed for the reason of commerce. Traces of this racism are seen in some parts of the spectrum even in the current times. This power is maintained to ensure that there is continual growth and progress in the individual economies.
From this it can be concluded that Smith, Ricardo’s capitalistic views were used to understand the impact of lowering wages for the owners. Owing to this the societies chose to marginalize, oppress and cause slavery to maintain lower wages in the society.