代写PS：时间规律概念的不同观点和讨论分析
有许多其他的研究者和作者研究过时间规律的概念。其中一些与E的工作是一致的。而其他人则采取了不同的观点(Thompson, 1967)。据Sauter, Michael说，有人说Thompson对时间规律的观点不仅是以欧洲为中心的，而且似乎是性别化的。Sauter认为，时间的规律并不是工业革命的结果，而是自中世纪以来的一个过程，政府、经济学和宗教在日常生活中扮演着重要的角色。他在他的文章Clockwaters and Stargazers: Early Modern Berlin中进一步论证，时间的规律不是来自革命，而是来自树木，这是当地知识提升的一个组成部分，因为基于人的时钟通过活动策划组织得到了利用。
代写PS：时间规律概念的不同观点和讨论分析
他还反驳了汤普森的观点，即人们开始学习时钟的位置，以及社会中哪些群体使用哪种类型的时钟对他们来说也很重要。他进一步主张时间的规律不是外在强加于个人之上的，但人们认为这是一种通过具有特殊技能和独特知识的个人来确定的标准(Thompson, 1967)。他在这里提出的论点是，在最初的日子里，钟表的基础要么是太阳要么是月亮，但在19世纪之后，情况发生了变化，是科学家通过大量的研究开始使用特殊的工具来描绘时间。其他讨论时间规律的研究者是Paul Glennie和Nigel Thrift在他们的文章《塑造一天:英格兰和威尔士的计时历史，1300-1800》中提到的。他们也遵循了E。P·汤普森。作者还利用他对时钟的假设，将其作为基于时间的资本管理的核心工具。在他们的书中，时间为其数据广度和制表而记录历史的过程从此变得狭窄。
代写PS：时间规律概念的不同观点和讨论分析
There have been many other researchers and authors who have researched the notions of time discipline. Some have been aligned with the work by E.P Thompson while others have adopted a differing viewpoint (Thompson, 1967). According to Sauter, Michael, it has been said that the approach of Thompson to the perspective of time discipline is not only Eurocentric, but also appears to be gendered. The discipline of time did not happen according to Sauter because of revolution of industries, but it has been a process since the middle centric ages as major roles were played by the government, economics and religion in daily life. He further argued in his article Clockwaters and Stargazers: Early Modern Berlin that the discipline of time came not from the revolution, but only from trees and this was a component of local knowledge enhancement as people based clocks were utilized through event planning organizations.
代写PS：时间规律概念的不同观点和讨论分析
He also argued denying the notions of Thompson that people started learning the locations of clocks and which groups in the societies used what type of clocks was also essential to them. He further indulged in arguing that the discipline of time is not imposed externally over individuals, but people have considered this as a standard determined through individuals with special skills and unique knowledge (Thompson, 1967). The argument he presents here is that in the initial days, the basis of the clocks were either the sun or the moon but after 1800s, this changed and it was the scientists who through considerable research started to portray time using special tools. Other researchers who discussed the time discipline were Paul Glennie and Nigel Thrift in their article “Shaping the day: A timekeeping history in England and Wales, 1300-1800. They also followed the perspectives set forward by E.P Thompson. The authors also made use of his assumptions on the clock use as a central tool of time based capital management. In their book, the process of time keeping history for its data breadth and tabulation is henceforth narrow.
