代写:文章的总结与思考
许多研究人员和经济学家表示，经济增长明显放缓。然而，其他人试图解读经济以可持续速度增长的信号。在目前的背景下，就业市场的增长已经放缓，而且似乎是剧烈的(Bergstrand et al.， 2015)，这一点不容否认。然而，就业似乎也已开始放缓，原因是人们担心美联储选举引发的、与加息有关的担忧，或者是对全球经济形势的担忧。关键的可能性是复苏将会继续。然而，无论情况如何，决策者似乎都缺乏做出回应的能力。众所周知，美联储以设定尽可能低的利率而著称。
代写:文章的总结与思考
这是指它不会使用标准工具去削减刺激经济的速率(Bergstrand et al.， 2015)。在典型的意义上，这意味着转向财政刺激政策，但正确时机的可能性似乎很小。由于同样的背景，财政政策有可能会推迟到2017年由新一届政府接管。这进一步取决于新总统的优先事项。在承认经济衰退，并最终实施并通过财政政策的过程中，通常存在的差距也会参与进来，经济放缓可能会在近一年的时间里产生大部分的政策反应(Bergstrand et al.， 2015)。如果经济步履蹒跚，美联储(Federal Reserve)可能会回到放松量化事实的政策上来。
代写:文章的总结与思考
It has been expressed by a number of researchers and economists that the growth of economy has slowed down in a significant manner. However, others try to interpret signals for the growth of economy at a sustainable rate. In the current setting, there is no denial in the fact that the growth in job market has slowed down and it appears to be drastic (Bergstrand et al., 2015). However, it also seems that employment has started to slow down due to anxiety related to election of fears induced by Fed related to higher rates of interest, or concerns in context with the global economy. The key probability is that the recovery will be running the course. However, no matter what the scenario is, there seems to be a lack of ability among policy makers for giving a response. The Federal Reserve is known for having set rates of interest, being as low as possible.
代写:文章的总结与思考
This refers to the fact that it will not use the standard tool to cut out rate for the stimulation of economy (Bergstrand et al., 2015). In the typical sense, this suggests to turn towards stimulus of fiscal policy yet the odds for correct timing appears to be slim. Due to the same context, there are chances that the fiscal policy will delay until the office is taken up by the new administration in the year 2017. This further ahead depends on the priorities of the new president. With the involvement of usual gaps in the recognition of downturn and then to ultimately carry and pass the fiscal policy, and there are chances that the slowdown of economy will generate majority of the response of policy for almost a year (Bergstrand et al., 2015). If there is faltering of the economy, the Federal Reserve might end up returning to a policy of easing out quantitative facts.
