代写演讲稿PPT：苏格拉底的论证分析
最初，这个类比就像Thrasymachus的优势，作为一个迅速的回应，苏格拉底最终把它作为他的新异议。他断言，所有艺术的运用都是基于对主体利益的认识，而不是工匠利益。与Thrasymachus相似，苏格拉底认为统治是一种艺术形式。他进一步声称，在行使裁决时，要考虑到主体的利益。在整个论证中，Thrasymachus成功地被动地同意了苏格拉底的观点。然而，在得出结论时却遭到了彻底的拒绝。
代写演讲稿PPT：苏格拉底的论证分析
从反对的观点来看，与这个论点相关的一个主要的有问题的观点是苏格拉底认为，统治作为一种艺术就像导航和医学一样可以被认为是艺术的形式。然而，不管潜在的弱点是什么，苏格拉底的类比运用是一个不能被Thrasymachus质疑的论证要素。这是不可能做到的，尤其是在不引起苏格拉底第一次反对的情况下。虽然苏格拉底之前的论点中的弱点似乎是可以原谅的，但有许多因素使其极具争议性。为了展开这个论点，苏格拉底认为一个公正的个人是否被认为超越了不公正的个人。另一方面，这个不公正的人表现出了超越的意愿，并从每个人身上获得了最好的东西。
代写演讲稿PPT：苏格拉底的论证分析
Initially, the analogy worked as per the advantage of Thrasymachus, as a prompt response, Socrates ends up turning it as his new objection. He asserted that there is exercising of all arts with the perception of subject benefits instead of with the artisan benefits. Similar to Thrasymachus, Socrates has identified ruling as a form of art. He further claims that there is exercising of ruling with the perception of subjects’ benefit . In the entire argument, Thrasymachus was successful in passively assent the individual points of Socrates. However, there is a complete rejection on drawing out conclusions.
代写演讲稿PPT：苏格拉底的论证分析
From the perception of objection, one major questionable point related to this argument is the idea of Socrates that ruling acts as an art as navigation and medicine can be considered as forms of art. However, irrespective of the potential weakness, the utilization of analogy by Socrates is one argumentative element that cannot be questioned by Thrasymachus. This cannot be done especially without bringing in the first objection of Socrates in the dispute. While weaknesses in the previous arguments of Socrates appear somewhat excusable, there are a number of factors making it highly controversial. In order to open this argument, Socrates considers if a just individual is deemed for surpassing the unjust individuals. On the other hand, the unjust man showed willingness in surpassing and obtain the best out of everyone .
