Assignment First

本篇代写作文-香港众筹制度讲了到目前为止,香港是否应该制定有关众筹的法律仍存在争议,尤其是考虑到目前的政策愿景——去年将香港打造成金融科技中心。为了研究这一问题,本文通过对香港现行众筹制度的完善和运行情况的调查,从成本效益的角度为立法的争论提供了区域性的环境。由于条文的结论部分是肯定的,本文对众筹行为提出的建议也参考了国外的改革。本篇代写作文文章由美国第一论文 Assignment First辅导网整理,供大家参考阅读。

Rationale and Objectives of the Research

For striking equity between crowd funding development and investor’s protection, UK and USA were found announcing the different legislation of crowd funding in the March month of year 2014 and in the November month of the year 2015. In the related sense, the department of Treasury of Australia and the authority of monetary of Singapore made publication of papers of consultation in the last year. As a contradictory view, Hong Kong does not seem to have any legislation’s equivalent agenda until the present years. The single feedback of regulation in the problem of notice of warning by the Securities and Future commission in the year of 2014, trying to analyse the presently applied finance regulations facing distinct categories of movements of crowd funding and the risk involvement for resting investors.

In the present date, it is still a controversy that Hong Kong should make laws on crowd funding, specifically seeing the present policy vision 16 of promoting the city into a hub of FinTech last year. To examine the problem, this essay of research investigates the improvement of, and the operation of present regulations in Hong Kong for crowd funding, which gives regional circumstances for the debate of legislative from a perspective of cost-benefit. Since the conclusion of provision is in the partly affirmative, the recommendations which also provides by this essay for an act on crowd funding along with the reference to foreign reforms.

This research focuses on the achievement of following objectives:

(1) To examine the trend of crowd funding in Hong Kong

(2) To study or identify any success elements in crowd funding

(3) To examine how crowd funding makes changes in starting business