essay代寫：《公司法》中的公司董事權力和職責規定
公司法2001 (Cth)第9條規定了誰可以被視為董事。在公司中擔任管理職務的人可以被認為是董事。法律不要求他們被正式任命為董事。法律規定，如果公司的既定董事在一個人的主要指導下工作，那麽這個人也會成為董事。然而，這並不是唯一的限定條件。
《公司法》第181條規定，官員或公司的誠信義務。公司的董事或其他職務必須履行其職責，使其是出於善意、公司利益和有目的地履行職責。即使職責沖突，他們也必須誠實行事。第182條規定，公司董事不應濫用職權。公司董事擁有權力，因此，他們不能利用自己的職位以任何方式獲得優勢，從而可能對職位R v Byrnes (1995) 130 ALR 529造成潛在的有害風險。第183條規定，公司董事不得濫用職權。當他們遇到對自己有利的信息時，他們不能濫用這些信息。因其地位而獲得的資料必須僅用於其正當目的和原始意圖。它不應該以任何損害公司利益的方式使用
根據公司法，董事有盡職調查和適當註意的義務。他們不應玩忽職守，根據普通法和公司法第180條，他們應盡應有的謹慎和勤勉，作出適當的努力。
essay代寫：《公司法》中的公司董事權力和職責規定
負有註意義務的公司成員包括公司執行董事、高級管理人員、公司非執行董事、公司董事長等。根據法定職責，董事必須證明他們盡職盡責地工作，而在那個州，任何人都有理由這樣做。違反註意義務的抗辯事由如下。首先，如果董事能夠聲稱自己做出了積極的商業判斷，就可以運用商業判斷規則抗辯。或者，他們應該能夠表明他們做出了一個理性的決定，並且沒有個人興趣。其次，他們可以申請信賴防衛規則的保護，在該規則中，董事表明他們在做決定時依賴專業意見。第三，他們可以在展示他們授權的地方展示他們的辯護權。
essay代寫：《公司法》中的公司董事權力和職責規定
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 9, describes who can be considered as a director. A person who is in the management duty of a company could be considered a director. The law does not require them to be officially appointed as a director. The law checks to find out if the established directors of the company work under the major guidance of one people, then that person would also become a director. However, this need not be the only qualification.
Section 181 of the Corporations Act states that the duties of good faith for an officer or corporation. A director or other office of a corporation must discharge their duties such that they did it in good faith and the interests of the corporation and for a purpose. They must act honestly even if they have conflicting duties.Section 182 states that the director of the corporation should not abuse his position. The director of the corporation holds power, and hence, they can not make use of their position to gain advantage in any way which could cause a potentially detrimentally risk to the position R v Byrnes (1995) 130 ALR 529. Section 183 states that directors of a corporation should not abuse their power. When they across information that could be of advantage to themselves then they must not abuse that information. Information obtained because of their position must be used only for its rightful purpose and original intention. It should not be made use of in any ways that results in detriment for the company
According to the corporations Act, the director owes a duty of due diligence and due care. They should not be negligent in their duties, and according to both the general law and under the corporations Act section 180, they are to exercise their due care and diligence with proper efforts shown.
essay代寫：《公司法》中的公司董事權力和職責規定
The members of the company who have a duty of care are the executive directors of the company, officers, the non-executive directors of the company, the company chairman and more. Under statutory duty, the director has to show that they worked with due diligence, which any person in that state would reasonably have been expected to do so. The defenses afforded against the duty of care breach are as follows. Firstly, the business judgment rule defence can be applied if the directors can claim that they made a positive business judgment. Alternatively, they should be able to show they made a rational decision and had no personal interest in it. Secondly, they can claim protection with the reliance defense rule in which the director show they relied on professional advice when they made the decisions. Thirdly, they can show delegation defense where they show they delegate their powers of decisions.
