加拿大马尼托巴大学代写：社会心理学
1.这篇研究文章的主题是什么？
当勒内·笛卡尔观察到，“我想，故我在”（descombes，1991），他并没有说明自己。他所说的是，思想家们在他们的思维能力和思维过程中都是一样的。在观察中笛卡尔为代表的特质作为相似个体的一种常用链接。这是“主体性”已dwelved对本文研究的基本概念。
2.这篇文章与有关的研讨会有什么关系？
在研讨会的过程中，我们对各种专家提出的身份发展理论进行了思考。文章还强调了不同的理论和exlpians在这些框架的认同发展的概念。
3.在这篇文章中采用什么样的方法或方法（访谈，焦点小组，理论）？
这篇文章的重依赖于对其调查结果的理论文献的回顾。这样的方法有助于清楚地了解不同的因素是如何共同工作的，在发展的主体性。对于读者来说，这种方法被证明是有益的，他/她是自由的推断，这取决于他们的兴趣，研究在了解为什么主观性变得越来越重要，在研究中了解自我发展。因为不可能有奇异的解释主体，文献综述的方法呈现在读者双方的辩论：一个从精神分析角度和从福柯的立场。
4.调查结果是什么？
本文的一个重要的发现是，在主体性理论界一致的构造。这意味着个人没有出生与特定的思维模式，行为特征和偏好。这些随着时间的推移，通过个人的相互作用与其他自我在日常空间中，可以归因于政治，法律制度，哲学知识和个人感情。文章认为，影响思想的社会文化结构在主体性的发展中起着至关重要的作用。这是一个发现的文章，研究文化和政治的影响，可以更好地解释我们的行为和我们在日常生活中所面临的问题。
5.文章进一步的知识和辩论，在该地区的关键社会心理学？
文章的结论认为，主体性不是自然遗传的，而是通过世界范围内的沟通结构发展起来的，是批判心理学家进一步研究的一个重要领域。塔芬（2005）强调，“现实”作为我们感知的往往是一个社会互动的创作。由于这种相互作用涉及到语言的使用，可以说“现实”是语言的一种功能，它的解释。这在术语中意味着知识是通过社会的相互作用发展的。因此，重要的是重要的社会心理学家进一步研究语言和话语对自我同一性发展的影响。
加拿大马尼托巴大学代写：社会心理学
- What is the topic of the research article?
When Rene Descartes observed that ‘ I think, therefore I am” (Descombes, 1991), he didn’t signify himself. What he meant was that thinkers are alike in their ideation and though processes. In this observation Descartes represented a trait which acted as a common link for alike individuals. This is the very basic concept of ‘subjectivity’ which has been dwelved upon in this research article.
- How does this article relate to the relevant seminar?
During the course of our seminar we have pondered upon the theories of identity development put forward by various experts. This article also highlights the different theories and exlpians the concept of identity development within those framework.
- What methods or approach are employed in this article (interviews, focus groups, theory)?
This article heavy relies on review of theoretical literature for its findings. Such an approach helps in clear understanding on how different factors work in tandem in developing subjectivity. For readers, such an approach proves beneficial for he/she is free to infer depending on their interest for study in understanding why subjectivity is becoming important in the study to understand development of self. Since there can be no singular explanation of subjectivity, the approach of literature review presents before readers both sides of the debate: one from the psychoanalytical perspective and one from the standpoint of Foucault.
- What are the findings?
An important finding of this article is that there is unanimity among theorists on subjectivity is constructed. This means individuals are not born with specific thought patterns, behavior traits and preference. These get evolved over time through the individual’s interactions with other selves in everyday space which can be attributed to politics, legal systems, philosophical knowledge and individual feelings. The article concludes that it is the social and cultural construct which is made to influence thoughts play a crucial role in development of subjectivity. It is a finding of the article that study of cultural and political influences can better explain our behavior and the problems we face in our daily lives.
- How does the article further knowledge and debate in the area of critical social psychology?
The conclusion of the article that subjectivity is not naturally inherited but develops through communication structures within the world, is an important area for critical psychologists to study further. Tuffin (2005) highlighted that ‘reality’ as we perceive it is often a creation of social interactions. Since such interaction involves the use of language, it can be said that ‘reality’ is a function of language and its interpretation. This in term means that knowledge is developed through social interactions. Hence it is important for critical social psychologist to study further the effect of language and discourse on the development of self identity.
