論文代寫推薦：支持同性婚姻的論點辯論
來自宗教機構的其他人則認為，沈溺於同性婚姻是一種罪惡，但世界各地已經存在其他明顯的重大犯罪(Sharpe, 2013, 62)。人們不斷努力避免同性被接受(Sharpe, 2013, 71)。例如，印第安納州州長自豪地簽署了一項法律，使個人有可能進行反對同性戀的歧視(夏普，2013年，第301頁)。根據羅馬基督教(羅馬書，2:14-15)，同性婚姻即使沒有明確指出，也意味著違反自然法(夏普，2013,59-73)。他們認為婚姻不只是一種關系，而是根植於人類本性的某種東西，因此受自然法支配(Campion et al, 2015年第1853頁)。此外，那些反對同性婚姻的人指出，僅僅生育孩子的好處就在這樣的關系中被剝奪了，它要麽否認孩子的父親，要麽否認孩子的母親(自然)(Campion et al, 2015年第1853頁)。爭論表明，孩子最大的興趣在於在父母的陰影下長大(夏普，2013,59-73)。相反，與反對意見相反，婚姻是一項共同的人權，不需要他人的幹涉，因為性別認同是個人的(Campion et al, 2015 pp 1852-1853)。每個人都有權利選擇自己的性取向，同時他們也想參與婚姻(Sharpe, 2013, 64)。此外，結束性別歧視只會有助於提高人們的權利，並將有助於帶來平等(Campion et al .， 2015, pp 1852-1853)。
Others from religious institutes have argued that it is a sin to indulge in same sex marriage but there are other major crimes already apparent across the world (Sharpe, 2013, 62). Efforts are constantly made to avoid same sex acceptance (Sharpe, 2013, 71). For example, the Indiana governor signed proudly a legislation to make it possible for individuals to conduct discrimination that opposes homosexuality (Sharpe, 2013, p 301). As per Roman Christianity (Rom, 2:14-15), same sex marriage even though not clearly indicated is implies as a violation of natural law (Sharpe, 2013, 59-73). They argue that marriage is not just any kind of relationship but something rooted in the nature of mankind and therefore is governed through natural law (Campion et al, 2015 pp 1853). Furthermore, those against same sex marriage illustrate that the mere benefit of procreating a child is reaped away in such a bond and it either denies a child its father or its mother (natural)(Campion et al, 2015 pp 1853). Arguments state the best interest of a child to lie in being raised under the shadow of their father and mother (Sharpe, 2013, 59-73). Contrary, to the opposing opinions, marriage is a common human right and there is no need for interference of others as sexual identity is personal (Campion et al, 2015 pp 1852-1853). There is a right for every individual to select their sexual preference while they want to get involved with marriage (Sharpe, 2013, 64). Furthermore, ending discrimination of sexual nature will only help in enhancing the right of people and will help in bringing equality (Campion et al, 2015, pp 1852-1853).
論文代寫推薦：支持同性婚姻的論點辯論
最後，還有一些人認為同性戀活動人士支持同性婚姻的基本論點是錯誤的，因為他們認為同性婚姻是一個民權問題，就像20世紀60年代的種族平等鬥爭一樣(Sharpe, 2013, 59-73)。相反的論點認為這個概念本身是錯誤的。首先，他們認為性行為和種族主義是兩種不同的現實(Campion et al, 2015 pp 1852-1853)。男性和女性可能有不同的特征，如膚色白皙或膚色黝黑、高矮胖瘦、貧富等，但這些差異並不是婚姻不可逾越的障礙(Campion et al .， 2015, 1852-1853)。這兩個人仍然是男性和女性，因此自然的要求得到了尊重，而同性婚姻完全違背了自然(Campion et al, 2015 pp 1852-1853)。同性的兩個人，無視他們的財富、身材和財富，由於無法克服的天性在生物學上的不可能性，不自然地傾向於形成基於婚姻的紐帶(Campion et al, 2015 pp 1852-1853)。然而，社會學分析有助於以一種獨特的方式看待一個熟悉的現象，比如同性婚姻問題(Sharpe, 2013, 73)。然而，根據Campion等人進行的n訪談，大多數性工作者都同意同性婚姻是一個社會科學問題，絕不是政治之外的問題(Campion等人，2015年第1852-1853頁)。同性婚姻已經被推到了政治議程的舞臺上，以便形成觀念並引發辯論，但從人權的角度來看，這只是一個需要考慮的問題(Woodford et al .， 2012，第71頁)。社會接受同性關系，並將基於性別的壓迫理解為性暴力和家庭暴力的主要原因，這與支持同性婚姻有著積極的聯系(Sharpe, 2013, 59)。
Finally, others have argued that homosexual activists have a wrong foundational argument in favour of same sex marriage as they regard it to be an issue of civil right which is same as the racial equality struggle in 1960s (Sharpe, 2013, 59-73). Opposing arguments state that this notion itself is false. Firstly, they argue that behaviour sexually and racism is two different kinds of realities (Campion et al, 2015 pp 1852-1853). A male and female may have different features such as being fair or dark, tall or short, fat or thin and rich or poor but these are not the differences that are insurmountable barriers to marriage (Campion et al, 2015, 1852-1853). The two people still are male and female and therefore the natural requirement has been respected while same sex marriage is completely in opposition to nature (Campion et al, 2015 pp 1852-1853). Two people with same sex, disregard their wealth, stature and wealth, are not naturally favourable to form a marriage based bond due to the biological impossibilities of insurmountable nature (Campion et al, 2015 pp 1852-1853). However, sociological analysis helps in looking at a familiar phenomenon in a distinct manner such as the issue of same sex marriage (Sharpe, 2013, 73). Most sexual workers however as per n interview conducted in the study by Campion et al, have agreed that same sex marriage is a social science issue and that by no means stands external to politics (Campion et al, 2015 pp 1852-1853). Same sex marriage has been pushed to the arena of political agenda in order to formulate notions and instigate debates but it is only a matter of consideration when viewed from human rights perspective (Woodford et al, 2012, pp 71). The society exerts acceptance of same sex relationships and provides an understanding of oppression based on gender as the main cause for sexual violence and domestic assault which has a positive association with supporting same sex marriage (Sharpe, 2013, 59).
