Recent developments and prospects of the company and any group etc. and because of this is against the very intention of the existing members as they want to minimize the public scrutiny but here if public become the member of the Company then they have the right to get those detail of the company which they are entitled for example :
To check the various type of registers such as charge, members, investments, minutes of the board meeting and minute of the general meeting those which they are allowed as per the law and the article of the company however article of a public company cannot reduce the transparency rather they can enhance the Same, and enhancing is not in the favor of existing member as they have expressed about the same.
It has to comply the requirement of SOX Act, 2002 basically of section 404, & 302 and of course of penal provisions also.
Thus if the existing members of the company wants to take the benefit and bear the disadvantageous as discussed above then it can go to raise the fund through the public.
As mentioned at the last of the Question that it wants to have the full control over the Company and minimum Scrutiny then it should not go for it as in case of public company it requires transparency which is not in favor of the existing members however if it want to get the benefit of the advantageous and may bear the disadvantageous as discussed it may go for the same.
最近的事态发展和公司的前景和任何一组等，因为这是针对现有成员的意图为他们想减少公众的监督，但如果公众成为公司的成员，他们有权得到详细的公司，他们有权为例：
检查寄存器如电荷，各种类型的成员，投资，对大会那些允许他们按照法律和公司然而公共公司不能减少的透明度，而他们可以提高同一篇文章的董事会会议，分钟，分钟，和提高是不存在的成员的支持他们表达了对同一。
它必须遵守萨班斯法案的要求，2002个基本部分404，和302，刑法规定课程。
因此，如果公司的现有成员要以利益和承担不利如上所述就可以去通过公募基金。
在提到的问题上，要有充分的控制权的公司和最小的审查，那么它不应该去为它如公共公司需要透明度不利于现有的成员，但是如果想得到有利的效益和可能承担的不利的讨论它可以对同一。
