美国德克萨斯基督教大学论文代写：文化差异
考虑到上述问题，可以说所有发生的问题都是由于双方无效的假设和缺乏研究的结果。美国队应该对中国的文化进行一致的研究（Ailon，2008）。而且，团队应该做的最重要的事情是聘请他们的翻译。在会议期间，所有的成员都非常不舒服，因为他们不懂中文，也不相信中国队提供的翻译。
考虑到中国代表队的情况，他们应该始终明确组织会议的动机。美国队被迷惑了，因为会议的主要动机没有被解释（Bing，2004）。举办这个活动的时候，中国队应该说明一下这样做的姿态。
即使美国队已经意识到他们将不得不多次访问中国，球队现在应该开始在商业和个人理解的背景下为会议做准备。
按照上述霍夫斯泰德的模型，可以得出结论：所有组织的文化都是单一的，垄断的和统一的（Fischer，2009）。然而，不可否认的是，在当今全球化的时代，不同的国家从事商业活动。正如所提供的情况，中国和美国正在进一步开展业务活动。
美国德克萨斯基督教大学论文代写：文化差异
In consideration with the above stated issues, it can be stated that all the problems that took place were due to invalid assumptions and lack of research being done by both the parties. The team of the United States should have done consistent research about the culture of China (Ailon, 2008). Moreover, the most important thing that should have been done by the team was to hire their translator. In the duration of the meeting, all of the members of the team had been highly uncomfortable as they did not know Chinese language and hesitated to trust the translator provided by the team of China.
Considering the case of the team of China, they should have consistently clarified their motive for organizing the meeting. The team of the United States had been confused as the main motive of the meeting had not been explained (Bing, 2004). When the event was held, the team of China should have explained their gesture of doing so.
Even though the team of United States was aware of the fact that they will have to keep visiting China multiple times, the team should now start to prepare for the meeting in the context of business as well as personal understanding.
As per the model of Hofstede stated above, it can be concluded that the culture of all organizations are known to be single, monopolistic and uniform (Fischer, 2009). However, the fact cannot be denied that in the current era of globalization, different nations perform business activities. As in the case provided, China and the U.S. were taking a step ahead to perform business activities.
