美国化学论文代写：离散事件的研究差距
对于作者所指出的研究差距，他试图通过强调两个重要的消极后果来提出改进建议。首先，现有的研究人员更关注离散事件，他们似乎忘记了环境中有机体反馈的影响。环境中的有机体可以理解为企业组织中的雇员。其次，通过决策理论和概率论等可能不适合连续过程的决策框架，对识别的离散事件和相关的判断过程进行了分析。
美国化学论文代写：离散事件的研究差距
作者使用了辅助数据收集方法，并使用了一种更理论的分析形式来呈现结果。在研究中，偏见已经减少，包括那些似乎与作者的观点相矛盾的研究。并给出了原始的框架和理论。在积极的环境下，判断和选择的连续性以及持续学习的影响，在决策时需要考虑反馈过程等因素，现有的研究也指出了存在的不足。这是未来研究决策时必须考虑的问题。
美国化学论文代写：离散事件的研究差距
For the research gap that author identifies, he attempts to make suggestions for improvement by highlighting two important negative consequences. Firstly, where existing researchers are more focused on discrete incidents, they seem to forget the effect of feedback given by an organism in the environment. Organism in environment can be understood as an employee within a business organization. Secondly, it is identified that most of the discrete event identified and the associated judgment processes have been analysed using decision making frameworks such as decision theory and probability calculus that might not be suitable for continuous processes.
美国化学论文代写：离散事件的研究差距
The author has made use of a secondary data collection methodology, and has used a more theoretical form of analysing in presenting the results. Bias has been reduced in research including those studies that seem to contradict the view point of authors. Original frameworks and theories are presented as well. The continuous nature of judgment and choice and the impact of continuous learning in an active environment, the feedback processes and more have to be factored in when making decisions and the remiss in existing research studies has been pointed out. This is something that future research works on decision making have to take into account.
