就这些信息而言，考虑到Agranoff和McGuire（2001）提出的观点，管理的任务经常被使用和考虑在一起。当网络管理人员具备上述所有活动的导航能力时，就可以实现与成功合作有关的先决条件（Lenferink et al。，2013）。因此，就网络管理策略而言，可以说网络管理为复杂网络的结果提供了积极的结果。
In terms of this information, and considering the view presented by Agranoff and McGuire (2001), tasks of management are often used and considered in combination. When management of network has the ability of navigating all of the above mentioned activities, there can be achievement of precondition related to successfully collaborating (Lenferink et al., 2013). Accordingly, with respect to the strategies of network management, it can be stated that network management provides positive outcomes over the outcomes of complex network.
Trust in Network Management
In studying network and its management in general, the term trust is used more frequently and is known to be crucial for the sustainability and performance of network (Considine, 2013). However, it has been identified that the focus is not the same over the outcomes of public network. In their model for effectiveness of network, it has been found that the most crucial variable moderating the effective of resources is the stability of network. The latter need develop the sufficient degrees of trust amongst all of the other factors.
Trust in terms of network and its management means that one is showing willingness for assuming a vulnerable and open position that implies the agreeable characteristics that are expectations, risk and vulnerability. In this context, focus is not being created in terms of dyadic relation, but in terms of the general effects of reputation on the basis of trust amongst the specific members of network, and over the network itself (Considine, 2013). For increasing and improving the scope of positive outcomes, networks are known to be enhancing trust. Accordingly, it can be hypothesized that higher degrees of trust in corporate networks will results in positive outcomes, such that actors involved in these networks will perceive higher and better quality.