1 What was the ‘motion’ of the debate? Was your group for or against the motion?
The debate was based on the real life issue. The chosen topic was ‘This house believes that TV does more harm than good’ this topic was too critical and is the most important issue in the human life now days. Our group was in opposition of the topic of the debate because TV not always harms but it also provides some useful and good information.
2 How well did your team work together on planning their part in the debate?
Our team first got the all related information by doing research, surveys or watching the practical implications of the TV in the real life now days. After this our team did a mock debate among ourselves and then took part in the debate.
3 How could you have worked better?
We prioritize the points while speaking in debates on the TV harm, its disadvantages, and advantages etc. which help us a lot in defining the sharpness of the debate topic. Our team only focused on the real life examples rather than virtually thinking for the harm or usefulness in next few years but yes we did the forecast study for the same.