Assignment First

美国物理学论文有代写的吗:内幕交易案件

现在这个规则及其含义表明许多利益相关者会很高兴。公众认为内幕交易案件存在很多漏洞导致内幕交易定罪问题。现在,这些问题使人们相信内幕信息违规行为没有得到妥善处理。但R v Curtis案(No 3)[2016] NSWSC 866清楚地表明,这种例外是不可能的。例如,柯蒂斯已经进行了大约45次交易,历时14个月,他仍然声称他不是唯一适合这种行为的人。他非常清楚他从内幕消息中受益,但他声称忏悔减少了他的量刑。柯蒂斯和他用来收购和处理金融产品的经纪人之间的一些对话表明,柯蒂斯先生非常清楚信息的重要性。他以非常自信的方式使用了这些信息,并将盈利调整到了143万美元左右。

美国物理学论文有代写的吗:内幕交易案件
现在,这些形式的个人收益表明,罪犯意识到信息的潜力,但他一再声称他没有获得个人收益。柯蒂斯先生声称,他的内幕交易和工作没有追求立竿见影的个人收益,他进一步表示,哈特曼先生被视为获得第一笔利润分配。哈特曼先生当然获得利润,但他们为谋取个人利益而获得的利润与柯蒂斯先生的阴谋有关,因此两者都是相互关联的。此时大约有四十五次交易。而且每笔交易都被认为是给柯蒂斯先生带来了好处,因此柯蒂斯行为的犯罪行为正在考虑之中。柯蒂斯先生对他的行为不认真的论点不能被接受,因为他曾经多次与行为相违背。来自现有录音演讲的证据表明,他确实意识到他所做的是错误的,因为他做了什么会有不利影响。

美国物理学论文有代写的吗:内幕交易案件

Now this rule and its implications suggest that many stakeholders would be happy. There were many loopholes in insider trading cases that the public had believed was leading to issues in conviction for insider trading. Now these issues are such that it causes people to believe that insider information contraventions are not dealt properly. But the case of R v Curtis (No 3) [2016] NSWSC 866 clearly showed that such exceptions are not possible. For instance, Curtis had carried out around 45 trades for a period of 14 months and he still claimed that he was not the only one befitting from the actions. He knew very well that he was benefitting from insider information and yet he claimed remorse to have his sentencing reduced. Some conversation between Curtis and a broker that he used for acquiring and disposing of financial products showed that Mr. Curtis was very aware of what significance the information held. He made use of the information in a very assertive manner had made a profit tuning to the amount of around $1.43 million.

美国物理学论文有代写的吗:内幕交易案件
Now these form of personal gains shows that the offender was aware of the information potential and yet he claimed repeatedly that he did not personally gain. Mr. Curtis claims that his insider trading and work was not pursued with the intentions of immediate personal gains, he furthermore stated that it was Mr. Hartman who was seen to receive the first distribution of profits. Mr. Hartman was certainly receiving profits but their profits for personal gains were connected to the conspiracy of Mr. Curtis and hence both were interrelated. Around forty-five trades were observed at this point. And each of the trade was considered as bringing benefits to Mr. Curtis and in this the serious of criminality of the act of Curtis comes under consideration. The argument that Mr. Curtis was not serious about his actions cannot be accepted as he had spoken many times contrary to actions. Evidence from existing taped speeches showed that he was indeed aware that what he was doing was wrong and there would be adverse implications because of what he did.