Assignment First

美国芝加哥洛约拉大学论文代写:民族文化

正在分析的案例研究是“在制造业谈判中展示东西方”。发现的主要问题和问题将在文化差异极大的背景下进行,美国对中国文化的了解不多。
3.1模型描述:格尔特霍夫斯泰德的民族文化模型
在这个模型中,霍夫斯泰德完成了民族文化的概念化。据他介绍,民族文化可以被概念化为共享,独特的按照领土,偶然的系统的方式,隐含的和最核心的概念之一(Inglehart,2007)。考虑到这个模型,这些特征对于国家文化的描述和理解是最重要的(Gilligan,2008)。考虑到这些特点,考虑到上述特点,霍夫斯泰德提供了一些民族文化的定义。

美国芝加哥洛约拉大学论文代写:民族文化
由于亚文化,所有国家都是异质性的,并非所有的个体都有相同的亚文化群。然而,几乎所有单个国家的个人都知道共享一种重要的民族文化(Geert,2010)。因此,按照这个模型,已经指出所有的亚文化都会在考虑到民族文化时具有一些共同的特征
2.根据这一模式,霍夫斯泰德认为,共享的国家文化不是强制性地被一个国家内的所有个人执行。不过,他表示:
个人没有比较。这是所有国家比较的答案中的中心倾向(Geert,2010)。很少有个案通过他或她的小组达成的平均点准确地提供了所有问题的答案:一个国家的普通个体不存在。

美国芝加哥洛约拉大学论文代写:民族文化

The case study being analysed is “East meets West in Show Manufacturing Negotiations”. The main issues and problems identified will be in context of the extreme levels of differences in culture and US having less knowledge about the culture of China.
3.1 Model Description: Geert Hofstede’s Model of National Culture
In this model, conceptualization of national culture has been done by Hofstede. According to him, national culture can be conceptualized as being shared, unique in accordance with territories, casual in a systematic way, implicit and one of the most core concepts (Inglehart, 2007). In consideration with this model, these characteristics are most important for the description and understanding of National Culture (Gilligan, 2008). In consideration with these characteristics, Hofstede had provided certain definitions of national culture in consideration with the above stated characteristics.

美国芝加哥洛约拉大学论文代写:民族文化
1.As all nations are heterogeneous due to subculture, not all individuals share the same subculture. However, almost all individuals of a single nation are known to be sharing one significant national culture (Geert, 2010). Hence, as per this model, it has been stated that all subcultures will be having some common traits in consideration with the national culture
2.As per this model, Hofstede has characterized national culture being shared is not compulsorily being carried out by all of the individuals within a nation. However, he has stated that:
Individuals are not compared. It is the central tendencies within the answers that are compared from all of the nations (Geert, 2010). There is rarely a case in which an individual provides an answer of all questions exactly through mean point his or her group has achieved: there is no existence of an average individual from a nation.