新西兰法学论文代写：代理合同
事实上，产品、服务和货物的制造商指定代理人代为促进公司的销售和改善经营活动。本合同为代理合同，适用于Nevin和trempz案例。
律师代理合同（委托人和代理人）
代理 代理合同或法律可以被定义为 商法 不可或缺的组成部分，与一个契约与非契约 关系研究。它涉及到一个人称为代理，他被允许的行为在 代表委托方和三分之一方的合同谈判。从法律的角度看，它也可以被称为具有股权关系之间的一个代理，也可以有一个表达以及隐含的权威，它允许代理在控制主下工作（希尔曼，2012）。为此，代理，允许在主要的谈判代表也可以形成合同关系。
应用法律案例
虽然Nevin作为代表trempz代理人，但他从未授权代表trempz购买是一定不会有这样的一个协议。如果Nevin没有在自己的同意购买机器，法院必须决定是否有效和具有法律约束力的协议，Nevin和trempz之间存在。如果法院能找到证据，没有结合Nevin与trempz然后他们不一定在代理合同。
结论
这是明显的从法律上说，Nevin没有被授权作为一个采购代理。他只授权销售公司的产品，以客户为代表的委托人，并能在这方面获得佣金。
新西兰法学论文代写：代理合同
It is a fact that Manufacturers of products, services and goods do appoint agents for acting on their behalf for promotion of the company’s sales and improvement of business operations. This contract is known as agency contract and it is applicable to the case of Nevin and Trempz.
Stating the Law-Agency Contract (Principal and agent)
The agency contract or law of agency can be defined as an integral part of commercial law that deals with a contractual and non-contractual relationship. It involves an individual known as agent and he be allowed to act on behalf of the principal and in agreeing for a contract with a third party. From a legal perspective, it can also be referred to as having a relation of equity between an agent and principal and can also have an express as well as an implied authority as it allows agent in having to work under control of Principal (Hillman, 2012). For this reason, the agent is, allowed for negotiating on the behalf of principal and can also form a contractual relationship.
Applying the Law to the Case scenario
Although Nevin has acted as an agent on behalf of Trempz but he was never authorized to purchase on behalf of Trempz and was never bound to have such an agreement. If Nevin did buy the machine on his own consent, the court has to decide upon whether a valid and legally binding agreement does exist between Nevin and Trempz. If the court can find evidence that there is no binding relationship between Nevin and Trempz then they are not bound under the Agency contract.
Conclusion
It is evident from the Law that Nevin was not authorized to act as a purchasing agent. He is only authorized to sell the company’s products to customers on behalf of the principal and can get commission in this regard.
