宗教学
弗洛伊德从他的马提尼抬起头,说,“不要用宗教作为借口来克服个人放在世俗的事务,由源的需求或希望我们城市化中由于有机和情感需求。”[7]卢梭暗自笑了笑,他说,“我们可以把苏格拉底的很好的例子,一个人不希望得到一个更好的方法比他的死亡,而在去世的朋友,做他最擅长的事情,谈论哲学。另一方面,一个不希望更可怕的死亡,比如耶稣,平息痛苦,谩骂、嘲笑,和整个社区的骚扰行为。但尽管如此,在这种可怕的痛苦的心,耶稣祈求宽恕他的残忍的刽子手。因此,插图和广受好评的生命和死亡等哲学家苏格拉底比生与死更体面的基督的人被认为是一个神。”[8]弗洛伊德张开嘴说话,卢梭切断他和继续说,“当上帝创造了一些东西,这是极大的完美,于是他知道了一切,监督所有违约和缺陷。然而,只要有了这个人的手中,它不仅退化,但一个人使用它为自私和其他消极的和邪恶的意思。[9]弗洛伊德分析卢梭所说的那些话,回报说:“宗教是一种幻觉,它的力量来自它爱上了我们的本能欲望。”[10]他继续说,“人倾向于认为人应该“幸福”的意图是不包括在“创造的计划。“[11]
宗教学
Freud looked up from his martini and said, “Don’t use Religion as an excuse to overcome the worldly affairs that individuals are placed in, by source of the needs or wants that we have urbanized within us as a consequence of organic and emotional requirements.” [7] Rousseau smiled inwardly as he said, “We can take the great example of Socrates, an individual could not wish for a better way of dying than him, who died while amongst friend, doing what he does best, conversing about philosophy. On the other hand, one couldn’t hope for a far more terrifying death, such as of Jesus, who was put to rest through anguish, with invective, ridicule, and the nuisances of the entire community. Yet still, in the heart of such awful distress, Jesus prayed for the forgiveness of his brutal executioners. Therefore, it is illustrated and acclaimed that the life and death of a philosopher such as Socrates is much more decent than the life and death of Christ who is considered a God.” [8] As Freud opened his mouth to speak, Rousseau cut him off and continued, “When God creates something, it is with the utmost perfection and he does so by knowing everything and by overseeing all defaults and defects of it. However, as soon as something is left in the hands of the man, not only does it degenerate but a man uses it for selfish and other negative and evil means. [9] Freud analyzed what Rousseau had said and in return remarked, “Religion is an illusion and it derives its strength from the fact that it falls in with our instinctual desires.” [10] He continued on to say that, “One feels inclined to say that the intention that man should be “happy” is not included in the plan of “Creation.” [11]
